INSIGHTS & IDEAS
arrow

Predictions with Ensemble Learning in Agentic Treasury

In my Agentic Treasury and Liquidity Management (TLM), I shared about my latest open source Agentic TLM on GitHub. In this post, I like to talk about the ML technique that was used in Cash Flow Forecasting Agent (CFFA) — “The Oracle” agent.

Ensemble learning is a machine learning paradigm where multiple models, often referred to as “weak learners,” are trained to solve the same problem and then combined to achieve better performance than any single model could. The core idea is that by aggregating the predictions of diverse models, we can reduce bias, variance, and improve overall prediction accuracy and robustness.

Our Cash Flow Forecasting Agent (CFFA), “The Oracle,” integrates three distinct machine learning models to harness the power of ensemble learning:

  • Random Forest Regressor: A traditional yet powerful ensemble method that builds multiple decision trees and merges their predictions to improve accuracy and control overfitting.
  • Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Network: A type of recurrent neural network (RNN) particularly adept at learning from sequential data, making it ideal for time series forecasting like cash flow.
  • Transformer Network: A state-of-the-art deep learning model that utilizes attention mechanisms to weigh the importance of different parts of the input sequence, excelling in capturing long-range dependencies in data.

The _generate_ensemble_forecast method is the central orchestrator of the ensemble process within the Cash Flow Forecasting Agent. Its primary responsibility is to gather individual forecasts from each of the trained models and prepare them for combination

Here’s a breakdown of its functionality:

  • Individual Model Forecasting: It first checks if each model (Random Forest, LSTM, Transformer) is trained and available. If so, it calls the respective internal methods (_generate_ml_forecast, _generate_lstm_forecast, _generate_transformer_forecast) to generate forecasts for the specified horizon_days and scenario.
  • Forecast Collection: The forecasts from each active model are stored in a dictionary, keyed by the model’s name (e.g., ‘random_forest’, ‘lstm’, ‘transformer’).
  • Ensemble Decision: If more than one model successfully generates a forecast, the method proceeds to combine them using the _combine_forecasts method. This highlights a crucial aspect of ensemble design: the benefits of combining diverse predictions are realized when multiple perspectives are available.
  • Fallback Mechanism: In cases where only one model produces a forecast, that single forecast is returned. If no models are trained or able to provide a forecast, a _generate_simple_forecast (a basic fallback) is used, ensuring the agent always provides a prediction, even under challenging conditions.

This tiered approach ensures that the agent is both sophisticated when possible and resilient when faced with limitations.

The _combine_forecasts method is where the true "ensemble magic" happens. It takes the individual forecasts generated by _generate_ensemble_forecast and combines them into a single, more robust prediction. The agent employs a weighted averaging approach, allowing different models to contribute to the final forecast based on their perceived reliability or historical performance. The model weights are predefined as follows:

# Model ensemble weights
        self.model_weights = {
            'random_forest': 0.3,
            'lstm': 0.4,
            'transformer': 0.3
        }

Here’s how _combine_forecasts operates:

  1. Iterative Combination: For each day within the horizon_days (the forecasting period), the method iterates through all the available individual model forecasts.
  2. Weighted Averaging: For each day, it calculates a weighted_value by multiplying the prediction from each model by its corresponding model_weight. The confidence_upper and confidence_lower bounds are also combined using these weights, providing a weighted ensemble confidence interval.
  3. Normalization: The weighted_value, weighted_upper, and weighted_lower are then divided by the total_weight of the contributing models for that specific day, ensuring the final ensemble forecast is a normalized weighted average.
  4. Alert Aggregation: Beyond just numerical predictions, the method also aggregates alerts generated by individual models. It intelligently combines these alerts, removing duplicates to provide a consolidated view of potential risks or important events.

This weighted average strategy is a common and effective ensemble technique, allowing the CFFA to leverage the strengths of each model while mitigating their individual weaknesses. For instance, if the LSTM model (with a weight of 0.4) is generally more accurate for a particular type of cash flow pattern, its prediction will have a slightly stronger influence on the final ensemble forecast.

Ensemble learning offers compelling advantages, particularly in the context of complex and volatile data such as financial time series:

Benefits of Ensembling:

Ensemble models consistently outperform single models by reducing individual biases and variances, leading to more stable and reliable predictions. By aggregating diverse forecasts, the ensemble mitigates the risk of a single model’s errors propagating into the final prediction.

Financial time series often exhibit highly non-linear relationships, sudden shifts, and significant volatility. Ensemble methods, especially those combining diverse model architectures like tree-based models and deep neural networks, are particularly effective at capturing these complex patterns that individual models might miss.

A common challenge in machine learning is overfitting, where a model performs well on training data but poorly on unseen data. Ensembles reduce this risk by averaging or combining predictions from multiple models, each potentially capturing different aspects of the data. This diversification inherently reduces the reliance on any single model’s specific biases or noise-fitting tendencies.

Each machine learning algorithm has its own strengths and weaknesses. For example, tree-based models (like Random Forest) excel at capturing complex interactions, while LSTMs and Transformers are adept at sequential dependencies and long-range patterns. By combining them, an ensemble can capitalize on the unique capabilities of each model, resulting in a more comprehensive and accurate predictive system.

The aggregation of multiple forecasts smooths out individual model fluctuations, leading to more consistent and stable predictions over time. This is crucial for financial decision-making where erratic forecasts can lead to poor outcomes.

When to Employ Ensemble Learning:

Ensemble methods are ideal for problems where the underlying data generation process is intricate and multi-faceted, making it difficult for a single model to capture all relevant patterns. Financial forecasting, with its myriad influencing factors, is a prime example.

In critical domains like credit risk management, fraud detection, algorithmic trading, and, of course, treasury and liquidity management, where even small improvements in accuracy can translate to significant financial gains or risk reduction, ensembles are a highly recommended approach.

When dealing with environments characterized by frequent and unpredictable changes (e.g., economic downturns, market shocks, new regulations), an ensemble’s inherent robustness, derived from its diverse component models, allows it to adapt more effectively and provide more reliable forecasts than a monolithic model.

The effectiveness of an ensemble hinges on the diversity of its constituent models. If you have access to or can train multiple models that approach the problem from different angles (e.g., statistical, traditional ML, deep learning), then ensembling is a powerful strategy to harness their collective intelligence.

The ensemble machine learning approach, powered by the _generate_ensemble_forecast and _combine_forecasts methods in our Agentic Treasury and Liquidity Management tool, represents a significant leap forward in cash flow prediction. By combining the insights from Random Forest, LSTM, and Transformer models, the agent provides banks with more accurate, robust, and reliable forecasts. This enhanced predictive capability empowers financial institutions to optimize liquidity, mitigate risks, and make more informed strategic decisions in an increasingly complex financial landscape. The benefits of improved accuracy, robustness, and adaptability, especially in volatile financial markets, underscore why ensemble learning is not just an advanced technique but a necessity for modern financial forecasting.

I encourage you to explore the open-source code.